. Leo
Albayalde post dedicated to the issue of religion in schools. The author relates that the first news we had of Feuerbach, Marx and Nietzsche was in religion classes. I think, for I was a teacher at that time that since the philosophy taught religion classes, perhaps up to me to-talk-to compensate for God and religion in ethics and philosophy classes. As I hear, so things were at that time.
was also a student of religion that was long ago. Although to be honest I do not remember very precisely what we talked about in religion classes, I only get bits of loose and inaccurate memory: charity, the devil, and the European Cup Real Madrid, poverty, crisis vocations, divorce and abortion ... But Feuerbach, Marx and Nietzsche I knew the kind of philosophy, the subject of ethics did not exist then, and all students were receiving religious education given by a Catholic priest were exempt only certain very special cases of students who professed other faiths. That time I was pretty hardened used to be very participatory in class and expected to get at least seven at the end of the course, the truth is that I found an amazing "free" in the ratings of June. Curious because I had attended all the classes and did not request a waiver, it seems that was the priest who decided to "objectively" by their own initiative and discretion, and without asking permission. I was not in bad estimates then, nor hold a grudge, despite being without a proper "seven" and the hassle of having to justify this strange house "exempt." Besides the priests and teachers I had were people, in general, friendly, easy to be more sympathetic to authoritarian, and I think it was us, the students, who were complicábamos more life to them, that they us. In short, the subject was considered by all of us as what is commonly called a "boiler" and so was spent things.
When I taught things had changed, the objection to the Catholic religion class was clearly recognized for anyone who wishes (and not only on grounds of religious conscience of the student, or the priest, who lived it seems he always had the active power of objection). And these guys take that ethic was introduced (I gave in my first year teacher) was an alternative to these kinds of philosophical religion which regards Alejandro. Things went changing (as it can not be otherwise) and ethics became a compulsory core subject (which did not fail to annoy some sectors for which it seems that the possibility of a separate moral of the Catholic religion can not announce anything but heteronomy, ideological manipulation ... what we will continue with the litany) Anyway as assistance to the philosophical religion classes designed and taught by the Catholic Church remained optional, for those who did not like was suggested that an alternative non-denominational religion, where he studied Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism ... and other isms. Things kept changing .... Many of us seems that the right of some to take Catholic religion classes (with or without a philosophical foundation) should not force others to take any other matter, whether of Taoism, environmentalism or kitchens.
The truth is that the Catholic church still has many resources available to public, teachers selected by the church itself, but paid by the state as any other officer .... public facilities that can do so free use and complete as any other department and a field which is optional in all classes except 2 Bachiller!. So do not be afraid by the philosophy ... reflection and freedom, which are Guaranteed.
do things ...
.
was also a student of religion that was long ago. Although to be honest I do not remember very precisely what we talked about in religion classes, I only get bits of loose and inaccurate memory: charity, the devil, and the European Cup Real Madrid, poverty, crisis vocations, divorce and abortion ... But Feuerbach, Marx and Nietzsche I knew the kind of philosophy, the subject of ethics did not exist then, and all students were receiving religious education given by a Catholic priest were exempt only certain very special cases of students who professed other faiths. That time I was pretty hardened used to be very participatory in class and expected to get at least seven at the end of the course, the truth is that I found an amazing "free" in the ratings of June. Curious because I had attended all the classes and did not request a waiver, it seems that was the priest who decided to "objectively" by their own initiative and discretion, and without asking permission. I was not in bad estimates then, nor hold a grudge, despite being without a proper "seven" and the hassle of having to justify this strange house "exempt." Besides the priests and teachers I had were people, in general, friendly, easy to be more sympathetic to authoritarian, and I think it was us, the students, who were complicábamos more life to them, that they us. In short, the subject was considered by all of us as what is commonly called a "boiler" and so was spent things.
When I taught things had changed, the objection to the Catholic religion class was clearly recognized for anyone who wishes (and not only on grounds of religious conscience of the student, or the priest, who lived it seems he always had the active power of objection). And these guys take that ethic was introduced (I gave in my first year teacher) was an alternative to these kinds of philosophical religion which regards Alejandro. Things went changing (as it can not be otherwise) and ethics became a compulsory core subject (which did not fail to annoy some sectors for which it seems that the possibility of a separate moral of the Catholic religion can not announce anything but heteronomy, ideological manipulation ... what we will continue with the litany) Anyway as assistance to the philosophical religion classes designed and taught by the Catholic Church remained optional, for those who did not like was suggested that an alternative non-denominational religion, where he studied Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism ... and other isms. Things kept changing .... Many of us seems that the right of some to take Catholic religion classes (with or without a philosophical foundation) should not force others to take any other matter, whether of Taoism, environmentalism or kitchens.
The truth is that the Catholic church still has many resources available to public, teachers selected by the church itself, but paid by the state as any other officer .... public facilities that can do so free use and complete as any other department and a field which is optional in all classes except 2 Bachiller!. So do not be afraid by the philosophy ... reflection and freedom, which are Guaranteed.
do things ...
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment