digital version of The New York: The Government will link the educational and occupational FP, milk! take two years studying the types of education, namely formal education, informal education and informal education, and now that, in a pas pis no longer make distintciones? can join? Poor Louis! efforts that the good Lord made for us to learn that the three subsystems of vocational training are:
- Vocational regulated: educational system for youngsters but adults have access and includes practices trabajo.Sistema centers educactivo .
- Occupational Vocational: depends on labor management, guides and qualified for the unemployed.
- Continuing professional education: it depends on the social partners. Training activities through which people used improve or adapt their skills and attitudes related to their profession, this includes social security programs, training workshops and trade houses.
And now my dear Louis, we have to forget why we were saying that the needs of the groups to which they are directed training are different, the objectives in the same way as the Ministry of Education and the Labour and Social Affairs as a minimum will help to ensure that all resources of the two come together, it not better to provide new resources?
The article continues: The FP will be the main tool of the Government to try to solve perhaps the biggest problem of the education system: 30% of young people leave education after compulsory education, while the percentage of students who attend middle-grade FP (accessible after ESO) far from the European average. In addition, another of the legs of the training programs are the new initial qualification, an alternative to 16 year olds who are at serious risk of leaving school without getting the title, ie the brink of school failure . These programs provide a professional title valid throughout Europe and the opportunity to continue their studies.
Well, honestly, I stay as it was the problems of school failure English educational system, because parents spend regain faith in a system which has shown from the start, go to revise the educational system from scratch, replace if necessary but common sense. We have experience and know very well that this model is that the patches are not applied to it, which is not to change the name of social guarantee program by the program of initial vocational qualifications, changes so they are not swallow one, it is necessary to review not only the content but the methodology (we leave behind the academic once, let's cognitive models, more innovative and will surely be more effective), where infrastructure taught, etc. And why is not this model? because in my point of view because it does NOT attract the student and not attracted, not in use and when not in use have truancy and school failure ... mm I think, if you have an idea to implement first you should do a poll or a study of the acceptance of this idea, the need there is of it, if you see that the idea is not necessary, it attracts, is definitely not valid What are you doing?
0 comments:
Post a Comment